HealthGlobal

Contact us at eHealthGlobalHealth@gmail.com

How should we define health? A MUST READ BMJ Article

The current WHO definition of health, formulated in 1948, describes health as “a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.”  At that time this formulation was groundbreaking because of its breadth and ambition. It overcame the negative definition of health as absence of disease and included the physical, mental, and social domains. Although the definition has been criticised over the past 60 years, it has never been adapted. Criticism is now intensifying, and as populations age and the pattern of illnesses changes the definition may even be counterproductive. The paper summarises the limitations of the WHO definition and describes the proposals for making it more useful that were developed at a conference of international health experts held in the Netherlands. Full article

Filed under: eHealth, Emergency, global health, obesity, Policy, public health, Research, Urgent

eHealth Research Evidence in 2011

eHealth Research Evidence (PubMed database) in 2011

by @bacigalupe

Selected References

Link to full references. Kudos to Open Source!! Still too many references are not available to everyone.

If you have a link to those unavailable here or you are the author, please share a link in the comments area)

Filed under: eHealth, global health, Media, public health, Research

CFHA Debate #1

Collaborative Family Health Association

LET THE DEBATE BEGIN! Visit CFHA’s facebook page each Monday to participate in an online debate. We’ll kick this experiment off with with some LET THE DEBATE BEGIN! Visit CFHA’s facebook page each Monday to participate in an online debate. We’ll kick this experiment off with with some collaborative controversy:

CFHA WEEKLY DEBATE 1: You’re starting an integrated team from the ground-up. Would you hire 3 mental health clinicians who view themselves as generalists (e.g. 3 LPC’s or LCSW’s) or would you prefer to have clinicians with some form of specialty focus (e.g. 1 MedFT, 1 psychologist, 1 addictions counselor)?

 
    • Benjamin Miller I would want a team that had skills that could generalize across the population. I don’t want someone who just gets depression, but would rather have a provider who understood that there exists a range of mental health need in primary care. There are enough “partialists” in healthcare, why promulgate another in the largest platform of delivery, primary care? Additionally, I don’t think that looking at degrees makes sense when integrating mental health providers. It is really much more who can accomplish what function. Communities may all have varying needs, and having someone who can address those needs will likely trump their degree or “specialty”.

      December 12 at 7:57am · Like
    • DeAnna Harris-McKoy I would want a psychiatrist, a social worker, and a family therapist. A multitude of services could be delivered with that team.

      December 12 at 9:00am · Like ·  1
    • Collaborative Family Healthcare Association This is Randall Reitz. My answer would depend a little on the setting. If it were a pediatric office, I’d want to have MedFT’s and perhaps a child psychologist, but if it were a family medicine office I would want to have generalist clinicians who match the skill set and patient panel of generalist physicians.

      My experience with people of numerous backgrounds is that our field attracts generalists, and like Ben suggests, the actual credential is less important than the personality and the commitment to learning the primary care ropes. I blogged on this exact topic at the Growing MedFT blog this morning: http://bit.ly/sbk3gz

      A psychiatrist would be fantastic, but mostly if we had a large practice. A part-time psychiatrist who could see patients along with the primary care docs (and/or perform chart reviews with them) would be a luxury in a smaller clinic.

      December 12 at 10:44am · Like
    • Paul D. Simmons I want whatever Benjamin Miller wants and the opposite of whatever Randall Reitz wants.

      December 12 at 12:08pm · Like
    • Gonzalo Bacigalupe Does the potential clinician understand issues of equity? Does the new hire believe being accountable to their community is core to the role and not an addition? Does the potential clinician believe equity is not about political correctness? Is the clinician willing to have her work being monitored and open to others to review? Does this clinician think that the work is about the patients, families, and their communities rather than some preconceived idea about confidentiality, close doors? Does this clinician know how to assess and intervene thinking systemically? Does this clinician knows what she/he doesn’t know (and therefore think that leaning on others is a plus and not a deficit)? Should he/she be generalist would be an issue only after the previous questions have been answered.

      December 12 at 12:10pm · Like
    • Gonzalo Bacigalupe Forgot, does this clinician think that using or learning how to use social media is not an option but a necessity?

      December 12 at 12:11pm · Like
    • Collaborative Family Healthcare Association This is Randall. Gonzalo, those are all excellent questions related to characteristics that would make a person to being a good primary care team member. They are the types of questions that lead some to believe that collaborative care is a separate discipline in need of its own credentialing process.

      While I share your enthusiasm for social media, I don’t see it as a core clnical function for collaborative care. I have a number of colleagues who are excellent integrated therapists who have never tweeted and who don’t maintain a facebook account. Perhaps our field will evolve clinically to where this question would need to be asked, but I don’t see it within the era of my career.

      December 12 at 5:17pm · Like
    • Peter Fifield I think there are other criteria such as individual flexibility, dynamism, exceptional interpersonal skill, fast paced oriented, etc that would trump the actual guild in which that person belonged.

      December 12 at 8:31pm · Like
    • Gonzalo Bacigalupe P, those yes definitely, was trying to be provocative. In respect to SOME, no doubt there are great clinicians who don’t FB or Twitt, but the requirement of needing to relate different with gathering data and sharing it with communities of practice is necessity if clinicians are to keep with speed of evidence development. Not that candidate needs to know but at least open to question the not need to assumption. Starting with being able to handle electronic records and on. Integration won’t happen just because someone is flexible or caring: need to but not sufficient… Will have to write a blog entry on this

      December 13 at 1:44am · Like ·  1
    • Gonzalo Bacigalupe The ability to seat around the table to think without 1st thinking of own guild: Substantial skill too.

      December 13 at 1:47am · Like
    • Collaborative Family Healthcare Association I would love for it to be the person(s) with the most skill but unfortunately traditions of hiring certain professions (combined with lack of parity in reimbursement among mental health professions) into these positions outweigh actual experience and competency in integrated care.

      December 13 at 10:35am · Like
    • Peter Fifield if that is the case…where is the talent?

      December 15 at 8:14pm · Like

Filed under: global health

A WordCloud

Filed under: global health

Desigualdades en Salud at #Salud2eus

 

Filed under: global health, , , ,

A Data Divide? Data “Haves” and “Have Nots” and Open (Government) Data

Nots” and Open (Government)

via A Data Divide? Data “Haves” and “Have Nots” and Open (Government) Data.

Filed under: global health

Decreasing Health Disparities and Social Media

Filed under: global health, ,

Health Care? Yep, There Ought To Be An App For That by Carmen Gonzalez

Health Care? Yep, There Ought To Be An App For That by Carmen Gonzalez

January 26, 2011 from the SOCIAL MEDIA HEALTHCARE BLOG #HCSM To comment visit:  Social Media Healthcare Blog

With Apple already having achieved its 10 billionth iPhone  app download, there is sufficient reason to think the age of the app has reached critical mass. What about health care-oriented apps? What can be considered “the best” from the pack? What is still missing from the app menu in medical offerings? Those questions were at the center of the Health Care and Social Media (HCSM) chat group discussion on Twitter last night. To see the full transcript, go to http://healthsocmed.com/2011/01/23/hcsm-january-23-2011/.  A summary of the group’s consensus is featured below, along with suggestions from my blogging mates on what more is needed on the app landscape  for patients, physicians and health care providers.

Given the patient-centered focus of HCSM chats, it came as no surprise that most members agreed that the best apps are those that affect the practical lives of patients, or as @DaphneLeigh colorfully put it, “[The app] Obviously has to be relevant and friggin’ user-friendly.” For added rigor, @MarksPhone stated, “a good app is one that aids the patient in participating in their health care effectively.”

When the HCSM group was quizzed on their recommended apps that fit that criteria, they offered the following descriptions:

For Patients/Consumers

  • apps that build in a social network (e.g. @FitBit or Zeo)
  • apps that monitor mood (e.g. Mood Journal)
  • apps that track migraine activity (e.g. iManage Migraine)
  • apps that log diet and exercise (e.g. Calorie Tracker by LIVESTRONG.COM)
  • apps that help patients find clinical trials or learn about the clinical study process (e.g. cTrust  and A Guide to Clinical Trials)

For Physicians/Health Care Providers

Read the rest of this entry »

Filed under: eHealth, global health

BMA warns against letting patients have access to their electronic records (BMJ) by e-Patient Dave

BMA warns against letting patients have access to their electronic records (BMJ)

According to the British Medical Journal, the British Medical Association (BMA) has taken a big, paternalistic step backward regarding patient participation. Or perhaps it’s a step in the right direction, formalizing their position as embracing 20th century thought: they warn that it’s not wise to let patients see their records, doctors will be deluged with emails, etc.

The concerns are familiar but archaic. Kaiser has ten years of experience showing that email reduces the total number of patient touches, and besides, patients love being able to read and write 24/7; etc. Our co-founder Dr. Danny Sands said, “How can patients participate if they can’t see the same information?” And how are they supposed to participate in shared decision making?

It’s not sufficient to say “The doctor will tell the patient whatever they need to know.” The record shows that time-pressured physicians commonly do not. And as we’ve said many times, whose data is it, anyway? Whose health is it?

You’re welcome to comment on the BMJ site. Anyone can submit a “rapid response” comment at this link. The online extract is here.

Note: the BMA was responding to an initiative described in the National Health Service’s white paper Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS(PDF, 339k), which we wrote about in November.

Read the rest of this entry »

Filed under: eHealth, Policy, public health

Undocumented Immigrants Excluded from Health Care Reform

Letter from Richard David:

Dear Friends -

Of all the dissapointments of this year’s health reform legislation, maybe the most politically destructive was the intentional exclusion of undocumented immigrants. They can’t even BUY health insurance in the exchanges! This concession to xenophobia is dangerous. Nationalist sentiment and attacks on minoroties in a time of economic crisis and ever expanding wars is not just another political trend. It is a particularly ugly and dangerous direction for American politics.

Michael Lyon, from California, drafted a late-breaker resolution to oppose the exclusion of immigrants from health reform. It is pasted in below. Please support this effort to put APHA on record on this issue.

Building multi-racial support for Latinos and other immigrants is urgently needed. If you want to help build support for this policy statement, please get in touch now or in Denver and we will coordinate our efforts. We need to have copies circulated in every business meeting and scientific session. People should stand up and speak out on this issue in every possible forum.

 

Opposing the Exclusion of Undocumented Immigrants from Health Care Reform

The American Public Health Association,

Noting that the Obama Health Plan, The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), not only leaves at least 23 million uninsured[i], but it explicitly excludes ALL undocumented immigrants,[ii] and,

Noting that the PPACA even forbids undocumented immigrants from using their own money to buy health insurance at discounted prices through the exchanges,[iii] and,

Noting that, as a group, undocumented immigrants have arguably the greatest need of having healthcare expanded to them because:

FIRST: Undocumented immigrants are twice as likely to be uninsured as documented immigrants,[iv] and,

SECOND: Undocumented immigrants are excluded from Medicaid and SCHIP[v] by federal law, and,

THIRD: Undocumented immigrants’ future access to healthcare will be more challenging because  (1) increasing raids[vi] and deportations[vii], and the Secure Communities Initiative[viii] make undocumented immigrants fearful of being visible, (2) State and County budget cuts are eliminating health services for  undocumented immigrants[ix], (3) Anti-immigrant groups are pressing jurisdictions to withdraw health services from undocumented immigrants[x], and (4) Legislators are even at the point of considering withdrawing citizenship from US born children of undocumented immigrants, contravening a 150-year old constitutional right,[xi] and,

FOURTH:  Many of the factors contributing to poor health indicators for immigrants in general are worse for undocumented immigrants, such as immigrants’ fears of presenting to health institutions, immigrants’ increasing unemployment rates and the higher cost of buying individual insurance, and health institutions’ fear of losing funding for treating immigrants.   Even among the insured, immigrants’ and their children’s access to ambulatory and emergency care is worse than that of citizens,[xii] and,

Noting that measures taken to deny healthcare to undocumented immigrants result in citizens losing healthcare also, as exemplified by the 2004 cancellation of Colorado’s Presumptive (Medicaid) Eligibility program, which had allowed pregnant women to receive prenatal care while their Medicaid applications were processed. The entire program was eliminated because about half of the women were later found to be ineligible by immigration status. Citizen and immigrant women alike were put at risk, as well as their unborn children.[xiii]

And finally, noting that  APHA has taken a clear positions against withholding medical care from undocumented immigrants in its resolution 2001-23, which “Urges the President and the Congress to oppose denial of eligibility for programs providing nutritional, prenatal, public health, medical care, and behavioral health benefits and services to any person residing in the United States on the basis of her or his immigration status”, [xiv] its resolution 9501, which “Opposes any mandates and initiatives that would limit access to public health interventions and health services for undocumented and documented immigrants and their children.”[xv] and its resolution LB04-07, which “Deplores and warns against measures curtailing, eliminating, or disrupting health care to undocumented immigrants.”[xvi]

Therefore, the American Public Health Association

Directs its Executive Leadership to communicate to the President, Congress, and media APHA’s opposition to the exclusion of healthcare for undocumented immigrants from Health Reform legislation, and

Directs its Executive Leadership to communicate to the President, Congress, and media APHA’s support of health reform that provides equal, comprehensive, affordable, accessible healthcare for everyone, regardless of status of health, employment, income, or legalization,  that is, Single-Payer Healthcare, and

Directs its Executive Leadership to communicate to the President, Congress, and media APHA’s demand that community health centers receiving $11 billion of dollars of federal aid over the next five years through the PPACA[xvii] give undocumented immigrants comprehensive health care, and

Encourages its members and Affiliates to attend future events on immigration reform (public rallies, demonstrations, press conferences and the like) with the demand of comprehensive, affordable, accessible medical care for all immigrants, regardless of legalization status.


[v] Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, “Summary: Five Basic Facts on Immigrants and Their Health Care,” http://www.kff.org/medicaid/upload/7761.pdf, March, 2008, (Accessed Oct 3, 2010).

 

[xi] Newsweek Magazine, “The Next Front on Immigration,”  http://www.newsweek.com/2010/08/01/the-next-front-on-immigration.html, August 1, 2010, (Accessed Oct. 3, 2010),

Politico, “John McCain backs citizenship hearings,” http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0810/40589.html, August 4, 2010, (Accessed Oct. 3, 2010).

 

[xiii] Wall Street Journal, “Prenatal Care Is Latest State Cut In Services for Illegal Immigrants,” http://www.uniset.ca/naty/maternity/wsj_imm_med.htm, October 18, 2004, (Accessed Oct. 3, 2010).

[xiv] APHA Policy Statement 2001-23: “Protection of the Health of Resident Immigrants in the United States,” http://www.apha.org/advocacy/policy/policysearch/default.htm?id=262, October 24, 2001, (Accessed Oct. 3, 2010).

[xv] APHA Policy Statement 9501: “Opposition To Anti-Immigrant Statutes,”  http://www.apha.org/advocacy/policy/policysearch/default.htm?id=96, (Accessed Oct. 3, 2010).

 

[xvi] APHA Policy Statement LB04-07 “Responding to Threats to Health Care for Immigrants,” November 9, 2004

 

 

Filed under: global health, immigrants, Media, Policy, public health, Urgent

Health Global Links

146_4696.JPG

healthglobal in twitter

blood
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.